good article:Repentance for a misspent youth

Repentance for a misspent youth

By Jonathan Rosenblum

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | "In every work of genius, we recognize our own rejected thoughts; they return to us with a certain alienated majesty," wrote Emerson. That pretty much captures my feelings upon finishing Michael Ignatieff's superb biography of Isaiah Berlin.

Berlin's command of the history of ideas grounds many of the intuitions that have guided my repentance over the past 30 years for the intellectual hubris of my friends and myself at Yale Law School. An important strand in Berlin's work was the demonstration of how the Enlightenment project of making human reason the measure of all things could end in the Gulag.

The anti-clericalism of the leading Enlightenment thinkers contained within it the potential for a new clericalism more authoritarian and murderous than that which it superseded, with intellectuals as its priests.

But Berlin was not just concerned with the most extreme deformations of the Enlightenment ideals. Though he defined himself as a man of the Left, he found that a similar cast of mind underpinned much left-wing thought from the French Revolution. Belief in a unitary human nature and a fixed hierarchy of values gave rise to the confident assumption that human reason can design a society in which the parts fit together harmoniously. The society thus designed would "free" man as never before by allowing him to fully develop all his capabilities.

The latter doctrine of "positive liberty," so admired in the young, "humanitarian" Marx, could easily end with Stalin's engineers of the soul. As Ignatieff sums up the matter: In Berlin's view, "the European Enlightenment was divided by a central contradiction between maintaining that men should be free to choose and insisting that they should be only free to choose what it would be rational to desire."

Rationality, of course, is best determined by the experts.

Berlin's project was to demonstrate that our most precious values — liberty, freedom and justice — inevitably conflict. Continually raising taxes on the top 1% of wage earners may bring about a more egalitarian society, for instance, but it is ridiculous to insist that there has not been some corresponding loss of freedom.

Disagreements about ends make it inevitable that the quest for smooth managerial resolution of conflict, Berlin felt, will forever remain a search for the Holy Grail. Soviet Marxism took the belief in central planning by experts to its apogee. But, Berlin pointed out, Western liberals were also prone to the illusion that all dilemmas of public and private life can be resolved by experts, psychotherapists and other "engineers of the human soul." The most learned of men, Berlin nevertheless insisted that intellectual elites have no business presuming that they know better than the man or woman in the street.

That the cult of the expert — itself an outgrowth of the Enlightenment's enthroning of human reason above all — should appeal to intellectual elites is unsurprising: It is a form of the revenge of the nerds whose superior qualities were unnoted by the pretty girls in high school. The assumption that "rationality" is a matter easily ascertained, at least by the brainy folks, underlies the preference for centrally planned economies by many intellectuals. Free markets are deemed too unruly, too irrational, as they give equal weight to the decisions of millions of consumers, those with high IQs and low IQs alike.

Belief in a single rational solution to every problem leads as well to nasty politics. Marxists have a term for those who fail to acknowledge the rational solution: "false consciousness." False consciousness can infect entire social classes, and when it does they must either be re-educated or eliminated. In non-totalitarian regimes, ridicule replaces re-education for all those too stupid to accept the consensus. Perhaps that explains why so many writers to the Yale Law Magazine find calling George W. Bush an idiot the height of sophisticated wit. Even "jokes" about Sarah Palin's Down Syndrome son and "retarded" family are not beyond the pale.

Not since the heady days of Camelot has the easy assumption that the "brightest" are the "best" held such sway in Washington D.C., or the cachet of prestigious Ivy League degrees been so high. The cult of the "expert" is reflected in the 30 or so "czars" designated to date. President Obama's choice for science czar, John Holdren, suffers from a particularly hardy case.

In the late 1970s, when it was claimed that the "population bomb" would render the planet uninhabitable within a generation, Holdren proposed a Planetary Regime to control the development, administration, conservation and distribution of all natural resources, with the power to set optimal population levels for every region of the globe and to enforce those limits by compulsory abortion.

Hubris levels are correspondingly high in D.C. today. The Obama administration tried to redesign the entire United States health care system — one-sixth of the economy — in a couple of months.

One notable aspect of the administration's proposals is the attempt to end competition between private health insurers, and with it the ability of individual citizens to decide what kind of medical conditions they wish to insure against and what percentage of their budget to allocate to health insurance. One size fits all.

With equal rapidity, the administration seeks to put in place Rube Goldbergesque cap-and-trade limits on carbon emissions that even President Obama admits will cause electricity prices to skyrocket, and which will, at least in the short-run, make America more dependent on foreign oil. All in the name of staving off a global climate change catastrophe, even though major polluters and economic competitors like China, India and Brazil have made it clear they will not sign up.

No wonder forging a "solution" to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to be imposed on the parties seems like child's play.

Ironically, the new "experts" are not notably more empirically based than was Soviet genetics under Stalin. Global warming — or rather catastrophic climate change, now that the Earth turns out to be cooling — is, says Nobel Laureate in Physics Ivan Giaever, the "new religion." Even as the ranks of leading scientists in the ranks of skeptics of alarmist global warming swell, and the predictive power of the alarmists' computer-generated models is repeatedly undermined, the first impulse is to stifle dissent.

Dr. Mitchell Taylor, one of the world's leading experts on polar bears, who has written that virtually all Arctic bear populations have either grown over the past 30 years or at are optimal levels, was disinvited to a meeting of the Polar Bear Specialist Group leading up to the Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change in December, on the grounds that his views on global warming are "unhelpful."

When Alan Carlin, a 35-year employee of the Environment Protection Agency, prepared a 100-page report questioning the agency's decision to classify carbon as a "pollutant," and thereby subject to EPA regulation without any Congressional action, he was ordered not to disseminate his report.

Closer to home, the anti-empiricism of the administration's foreign policy experts manifests itself in their inability to process the overwhelming evidence that the Palestinians do not share their definition of rationality, or seek a state of their own alongside Israel. Bigger still is the refusal to acknowledge Israel's less-than-happy experience with territorial withdrawals for peace.

From Medscape Medical News

Mediterranean Diet, Physical Activity Linked to Lower Alzheimer's Risk

News Author: Susan Jeffrey

August 14, 2009 — Two new cohort studies come to slightly different conclusions about the merit of adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet on the risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD).

In 1 study, researchers led by Nikolaos Scarmeas, MD, from Columbia University Medical Center in New York City, extend their previous findings, showing that both high adherence to the Mediterranean diet and higher levels of physical activity were independently associated with a lower risk for AD in a cohort of community-dwelling elders free of dementia at baseline.

In the other study, Catherine Féart, MD, from the Université Victor Ségalen Bordeaux 2 in Bordeaux, France, and colleagues, including Dr. Scarmeas, find that higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated with slower cognitive decline when measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), but not when measured with other cognitive tests. No association was seen for adherence to the diet and the risk for incident dementia, although the researchers point out that the power to detect a difference was limited in this study.

Both reports are published in the August 12 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In an editorial accompanying the publications, David Knopman, MD, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, assesses these results cautiously and points out that the benefits of an inherent tendency to healthy food choices in free-living individuals are most likely accrued over a lifetime and in concert with other kinds of healthy choices.

"I see diet as part of a larger pattern of healthy behaviors, and I see this result as supporting the idea that risk reduction for dementia begins at least in midlife, if not earlier," he told Medscape Neurology. "I really believe that changing one's dietary habits at age 70 is probably a good thing incrementally, but the greater benefit accrues the earlier a change in diet is adopted."

Lower AD Risk With Diet?

The Mediterranean diet features a high intake of vegetables, legumes, fruits, and cereals; a high intake of unsaturated fatty acids, mostly in the form of olive oil; a low intake of saturated fatty acids; a moderately high intake of fish; a low to moderate intake of dairy products, mostly as cheese or yogurt; a low intake of meat or poultry; and finally, a regular but moderate amount of alcohol, usually wine, generally taken with meals.

Previous research has shown that following a Mediterranean diet is protective against a variety of conditions, including hypertension, coronary heart disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity, and certain cancers, and is related to a reduction in all-cause mortality in the general population. Previous work by Dr. Scarmeas and colleagues has shown that higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk for AD, as well as prolonged survival in AD (Ann Neurol. 2006;59:912–921; Neurology. 2007;69:1084–1093).

Another, earlier, report from the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP) by this group, published in the February issue of the Archives of Neurology and reported by Medscape Neurology at that time, suggested that elderly subjects who followed a Mediterranean diet were less likely to develop mild cognitive impairment and were also less likely to convert from mild cognitive impairment to AD (Arch Neurol. 2009;66:216–225).

The current report is an extension of these latter findings from WHICAP, this time looking at the relative contributions of physical exercise and the Mediterranean diet on the risk for AD.

Subjects in 2 cohorts totaling 1880 community-dwelling elderly people without dementia were followed up for a mean of 5.4 years, with standardized neurological and neuropsychological testing done every 1.5 years. Adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet and amount of physical activity were derived from questionnaires and divided into low, middle, and high adherence to the diet and no, some, or much physical activity; all models were adjusted for a variety of factors including ethnicity, education, and apolipoprotein E genotype.

During follow-up, 282 incident cases of AD occurred. Compared with those participants with low adherence to the Mediterranean diet, those individuals with high adherence had a significantly reduced risk for AD. Similarly, those reporting much physical activity at baseline had a significantly reduced risk for AD vs those reporting no physical activity.

Those reporting no physical activity and low adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet had an absolute risk for AD of 19%, whereas those reporting much physical activity and high adherence diet scores had an absolute risk for AD of 12%.

Risk for AD by Adherence to Mediterranean Diet and Amount of Physical Activity

Measure	Hazard Ratio	95% CI	P for Trend
Low Diet Score	Referent	—	—
Middle Diet Score	0.98	0.72 – 1.33
High Diet Score	0.60	0.72 – 0.80	.08
No Physical Activity	Referent	—	—
Some Physical Activity	0.75	0.54 – 1.04	.08
Much Physical Activity	0.67	0.47 – 0.95	.03
High Diet Score Plus Much Physical Activity vs Low Diet Score and No Physical Activity	0.65	0.44 – 0.96	.03

Their results "support the potentially independent and important role of both physical activity and dietary habits in relation to AD risk," the researchers conclude. "These findings should be further evaluated in other populations."

Three-City Study

The second report by Dr. Féart and colleagues used data from the Three-City study, a prospective cohort study examining vascular risk factors for dementia in 1410 adults living in Bordeaux who were 65 years of age or older in 2001 to 2002. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was again assessed using a food questionnaire, and cognitive performance was measured using the MMSE, Isaacs Set Test (IST), Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT), and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Assessments were done at baseline and at least 1 other time during 5 years of follow-up.

A total of 99 new cases of dementia were validated by an independent expert committee of neurologists.

After adjustment for a variety of factors, the researchers found that a higher Mediterranean diet score was associated with fewer MMSE errors (β = .006; P = .04, for 1 point of the Mediterranean diet score), but not with performance on the other tests, particularly for those who remained free from dementia during 5 years.

However, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was not associated with the risk for incident dementia, although the researchers point out that their power to detect a difference on this endpoint was limited.

"The Mediterranean diet pattern probably does not fully explain the better health of persons who adhere to it, but it may contribute directly," the authors speculate. "A Mediterranean diet also may indirectly constitute an indicator of a complex set of favorable social and lifestyle factors that contribute to better health. Further research is needed to allow the generalization of these results to other populations and to establish whether a Mediterranean diet slows cognitive decline or reduces incident dementia in addition to its cardiovascular benefits," the authors conclude.

Findings to Be "Nibbled, Not Swallowed Whole"

In his editorial, Dr. Knopmen suggests that to say the Féart paper supports that of Scarmeas et al is "debatable," pointing out that although the MMSE results in the Three-City study would seem to be in line with the WHICAP data, this was true only when it was considered as a continuous and not as a categorical variable.

"The lack of consistent association with the other cognitive measures, especially the FCSRT, is of concern if pre-AD pathology was the target of the Mediterranean-type diet," he writes.

The studies reported in this issue, along with the earlier report by Scarmeas et al, provide only "moderately compelling evidence that adherence to the Mediterranean-type diet is linked to less late-life cognitive impairment," Dr. Knopmen concludes. He cautions against the sort of "feeding frenzy" of media attention with these 2 studies that was seen after the initial report this year by Scarmeas et al, pointing out that the "nuanced science of these studies...should not be consumed so unabashedly."

"The scientific value of these studies cannot be disputed, but whether or how they can or should be translated into recommendations for the public is the question," Dr. Knopman writes. "For now, it is reasonable to nibble on these findings and savor them, but not to swallow them whole."

The Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project is supported by the National Institute on Aging. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. The Three-City Study is conducted under a partnership agreement between the Institut National de la Santé et del la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), the Institut de Santé Publique et Développement of the Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2 University, and Sanofi-Aventis. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Knopman reports serving on a data and safety monitoring board for Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals (completed October 2008) and receiving personal compensation. Other disclosures appear in his editorial.

JAMA. 2009;302:627–637, 638–648, 686–687. Abstract

Clinical Context

The benefits of the Mediterranean diet on the reduction of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and overall mortality rate have been supported by numerous studies. The Mediterranean diet consists of plant foods (such as fruits, nuts, legumes, and cereals) and fish, with olive oil as the primary sources of monounsaturated fat and low to moderate intake of wine as well as low intake of red meat and poultry. In 2006, one study by Scarmeas and colleagues reported that adherence to the Mediterranean-type diet was also associated with a reduced incidence of AD; however, more studies are needed.

In this issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, 2 articles report the results of studies designed to replicate and expand on the initial reports. In the study by Scarmeas and colleagues, the aim was to evaluate the association of the Mediterranean-type diet adherence and physical activity with the risk for incident AD. In another study by Féart and colleagues, it attempted to replicate the association of Mediterranean-type diet and cognitive decline as previously reported.

Study Highlights

• Scarmeas and colleagues
  • 2 cohorts of 1880 elderly adults without dementia living in New York City were assessed for both diet and physical activity in relationship to AD risk.
  • Standardized neurologic and neuropsychological measures were administered approximately every 1.5 years from 1992 through 2006.
  • Participants were evaluated for adherence to a Mediterranean diet and physical activity, separately and combined, as the main predictors in Cox models.
  • Models were adjusted for comorbid risk factors with the Charlson index.
  • Main outcome measure was time to incident AD.
  • 282 incident AD cases occurred at a mean (SD) of 5.4 (3.3) years of follow-up.
  • Compared with individuals who were cognitively normal, characteristics of those who had AD were older, less educated, more likely to be Hispanic, less likely to be white, had a lower body mass index, reported slightly more leisure activities, and were less physically active.
  • In both adjusted and unadjusted models, more physical activity was associated with lower risk for AD. Report of some physical activity was associated with a 29% to 41% lower risk for AD, whereas report of much physical activity was associated with a 37% to 50% lower risk.
  • When considered simultaneously, both Mediterranean-type diet adherence and physical activity were associated with lower AD risk.
  • The middle diet adherence tertile was associated with a 2% to 14% risk reduction, whereas the highest diet adherence tertile was associated with a 32% to 40% reduced risk.
  • Similarly, compared with individuals with no physical activity, individuals reporting some physical activity had a 25% to 38% lower risk for AD, whereas individuals reporting much physical activity had a 33% to 48% lower risk for AD.
  • Compared with individuals neither adhering to the diet nor participating in physical activity, those both adhering to the diet and participating in physical activity had a lower risk for AD (hazard ratio, 0.65; P = .03 for trend).
  • Overall, the association of physical activity and Mediterranean-type diet was independent of each other.
• Féart and colleagues
  • 1410 adults (≥ 65 years) from Bordeaux, France, included in the Three-City cohort in 2001 to 2002, were evaluated for whether adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with change in cognitive performance and lower risk for all-cause dementia or AD.
  • Adherence to a Mediterranean diet (score 0 - 9) was computed from a food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall (median score 4.36 [SD, 1.66]).
  • Main outcome measure was the cognitive performance assessed on 4 neuropsychological tests: the MMSE, IST, BVRT, and FCSRT.
  • Incident cases of dementia (n = 99) were validated by an independent expert committee of neurologists.
  • After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and stroke, higher Mediterranean diet score was associated with fewer MMSE errors (β = −0.006; P = .04 for 1 point of Mediterranean diet score).
  • Overall performance on the IST, BVRT, or FCSRT with time was not significantly associated with Mediterranean diet adherence.
  • Greater adherence as a categorical variable (score 6 - 9) was not significantly associated with fewer MMSE errors and better FCSRT scores in the entire cohort, but in individuals who were free from dementia for 5 years, the association for the highest vs the lowest group was significant (adjusted for all factors, for MMSE: β = −0.03; P = .04; for FCSRT: β = 0.21; P = .04).
  • Mediterranean diet adherence was not associated with risk for incident dementia (fully adjusted model: hazard ratio, 1.12; P = .72), although this study was underpowered for this outcome.

Clinical Implications

• In the study by Scarmeas and colleagues, both higher Mediterranean-type diet adherence and higher physical activity were independently associated with a reduced risk for AD.
• In the study by Féart and colleagues, higher adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with slower MMSE cognitive decline; however, higher adherence was not associated with the risk for incident dementia

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
shame I like bacon fried eggs and chocolate and as little movement as possible